Lysis supports successful Fenergo programmes by ensuring client data, business rules, and workflows are understood, mapped, and delivered correctly. We help translate policy into platform — so that your implementation meets regulatory expectations, supports your operations, and is audit-ready from day one.
How Lysis Supports Fenergo Programmes
Whether delivering full Fenergo implementations or enhancing existing configurations, Lysis helps financial institutions ensure data integrity, operational readiness, and regulatory alignment. Our team bridges the gap between business requirements and platform configuration — making sure transformation is not just implemented, but effective.
1. Data Mapping, Migration & Integration Strategy
We ensure Fenergo implementations are powered by accurate, compliant, and usable data. Our team:
• Leads global data analysis and mapping exercises, translating business understanding into clean, structured inputs for Fenergo’s data model.
• Defines comprehensive migration strategies — ensuring data is not just moved, but validated, enriched, and aligned with Fenergo’s expected structure.
• Assesses existing systems and interfaces to define integration points, including APIs connecting Fenergo with case management and other systems.
• Guides clients through field rationalisation, value mapping, and data cleansing logic to optimise onboarding and lifecycle workflows.
2. Business Rule Definition, Configuration & Target Operating Model
Fenergo requires clear, logic-driven rules to function effectively. Lysis delivers:
• End-to-end documentation of conditional rules, workflow logic, and policy triggers across KYC, regulatory, and tax domains.
• A defined Target Operating Model aligned with Fenergo’s capabilities — incorporating global compliance frameworks and automated KYC triggers.
• Policy-to-configuration translation: ensuring business intent is accurately reflected in the platform’s rule engine and approval flows.
• Experience in steering scope and project stage definitions to drive efficient delivery and minimise ambiguity across global teams.
3. Business Engagement, Workshops & Requirements Management
We ensure stakeholder alignment by leading structured, cross-functional collaboration across business and compliance teams. Lysis:
• Facilitates and documents workshops across AML, CDD, Regulatory, QC, Client Services, and Compliance teams to gather, challenge, and validate requirements.
• Produces high-quality business documentation including Requirements Bibles, Policy Specs, Impact Analyses, and Data Protection assessments.
• Maintains traceability from user stories to acceptance criteria, ensuring complete coverage and sign-off at each delivery stage.
• Works with system owners (e.g. Risk, Screening, EDD, and Compliance) to align end-to-end process flows and platform configuration.
4. Testing, UAT & Post-Migration Validation
From functional readiness to real-world performance, we provide assurance that your Fenergo platform delivers as expected:
• Designs and documents UAT plans that align with policy, risk, and operational requirements.
• Supports hands-on testing and validation of workflows, client records, risk classifications, and document triggers.
• Ensures that integrated controls (e.g. EDD workflows, reassessment processes, and alerts) function as designed post-implementation.
• Provides dashboards and reporting support using tools to track progress and issues across phases.
5. KYC Data Quality & Remediation for Fenergo Readiness
Fenergo relies on accurate and compliant data. We help:
• Set and enforce data quality standards: Defining what “good” data looks like in terms of completeness, formatting, and documentation.
• Drive data remediation: Identifying and cleansing incomplete or outdated records — with rules.
• Support risk model alignment: Ensuring correct field population to support Fenergo’s risk and workflow logic.
• Monitor progress: Leveraging tools for dashboarding and issue tracking.
From strategy and design to execution and validation, Lysis provides the clarity, structure, and expertise needed to deliver business-ready Fenergo implementations.
Lysis supports successful Fenergo programmes by ensuring client data, business rules, and workflows are understood, mapped, and delivered correctly. We help translate policy into platform — so that your implementation meets regulatory expectations, supports your operations, and is audit-ready from day one.
How Lysis Supports Fenergo Programmes
Whether delivering full Fenergo implementations or enhancing existing configurations, Lysis helps financial institutions ensure data integrity, operational readiness, and regulatory alignment. Our team bridges the gap between business requirements and platform configuration — making sure transformation is not just implemented, but effective.
1. Data Mapping, Migration & Integration Strategy
We ensure Fenergo implementations are powered by accurate, compliant, and usable data. Our team:
• Leads global data analysis and mapping exercises, translating business understanding into clean, structured inputs for Fenergo’s data model.
• Defines comprehensive migration strategies — ensuring data is not just moved, but validated, enriched, and aligned with Fenergo’s expected structure.
• Assesses existing systems and interfaces to define integration points, including APIs connecting Fenergo with case management and other systems.
• Guides clients through field rationalisation, value mapping, and data cleansing logic to optimise onboarding and lifecycle workflows.
2. Business Rule Definition, Configuration & Target Operating Model
Fenergo requires clear, logic-driven rules to function effectively. Lysis delivers:
• End-to-end documentation of conditional rules, workflow logic, and policy triggers across KYC, regulatory, and tax domains.
• A defined Target Operating Model aligned with Fenergo’s capabilities — incorporating global compliance frameworks and automated KYC triggers.
• Policy-to-configuration translation: ensuring business intent is accurately reflected in the platform’s rule engine and approval flows.
• Experience in steering scope and project stage definitions to drive efficient delivery and minimise ambiguity across global teams.
3. Business Engagement, Workshops & Requirements Management
We ensure stakeholder alignment by leading structured, cross-functional collaboration across business and compliance teams. Lysis:
• Facilitates and documents workshops across AML, CDD, Regulatory, QC, Client Services, and Compliance teams to gather, challenge, and validate requirements.
• Produces high-quality business documentation including Requirements Bibles, Policy Specs, Impact Analyses, and Data Protection assessments.
• Maintains traceability from user stories to acceptance criteria, ensuring complete coverage and sign-off at each delivery stage.
• Works with system owners (e.g. Risk, Screening, EDD, and Compliance) to align end-to-end process flows and platform configuration.
4. Testing, UAT & Post-Migration Validation
From functional readiness to real-world performance, we provide assurance that your Fenergo platform delivers as expected:
• Designs and documents UAT plans that align with policy, risk, and operational requirements.
• Supports hands-on testing and validation of workflows, client records, risk classifications, and document triggers.
• Ensures that integrated controls (e.g. EDD workflows, reassessment processes, and alerts) function as designed post-implementation.
• Provides dashboards and reporting support using tools to track progress and issues across phases.
5. KYC Data Quality & Remediation for Fenergo Readiness
Fenergo relies on accurate and compliant data. We help:
• Set and enforce data quality standards: Defining what “good” data looks like in terms of completeness, formatting, and documentation.
• Drive data remediation: Identifying and cleansing incomplete or outdated records — with rules.
• Support risk model alignment: Ensuring correct field population to support Fenergo’s risk and workflow logic.
• Monitor progress: Leveraging tools for dashboarding and issue tracking.
From strategy and design to execution and validation, Lysis provides the clarity, structure, and expertise needed to deliver business-ready Fenergo implementations.
Lysis supports successful Fenergo programmes by ensuring client data, business rules, and workflows are understood, mapped, and delivered correctly. We help translate policy into platform — so that your implementation meets regulatory expectations, supports your operations, and is audit-ready from day one.
How Lysis Supports Fenergo Programmes
Whether delivering full Fenergo implementations or enhancing existing configurations, Lysis helps financial institutions ensure data integrity, operational readiness, and regulatory alignment. Our team bridges the gap between business requirements and platform configuration — making sure transformation is not just implemented, but effective.
1. Data Mapping, Migration & Integration Strategy
We ensure Fenergo implementations are powered by accurate, compliant, and usable data. Our team:
• Leads global data analysis and mapping exercises, translating business understanding into clean, structured inputs for Fenergo’s data model.
• Defines comprehensive migration strategies — ensuring data is not just moved, but validated, enriched, and aligned with Fenergo’s expected structure.
• Assesses existing systems and interfaces to define integration points, including APIs connecting Fenergo with case management and other systems.
• Guides clients through field rationalisation, value mapping, and data cleansing logic to optimise onboarding and lifecycle workflows.
2. Business Rule Definition, Configuration & Target Operating Model
Fenergo requires clear, logic-driven rules to function effectively. Lysis delivers:
• End-to-end documentation of conditional rules, workflow logic, and policy triggers across KYC, regulatory, and tax domains.
• A defined Target Operating Model aligned with Fenergo’s capabilities — incorporating global compliance frameworks and automated KYC triggers.
• Policy-to-configuration translation: ensuring business intent is accurately reflected in the platform’s rule engine and approval flows.
• Experience in steering scope and project stage definitions to drive efficient delivery and minimise ambiguity across global teams.
3. Business Engagement, Workshops & Requirements Management
We ensure stakeholder alignment by leading structured, cross-functional collaboration across business and compliance teams. Lysis:
• Facilitates and documents workshops across AML, CDD, Regulatory, QC, Client Services, and Compliance teams to gather, challenge, and validate requirements.
• Produces high-quality business documentation including Requirements Bibles, Policy Specs, Impact Analyses, and Data Protection assessments.
• Maintains traceability from user stories to acceptance criteria, ensuring complete coverage and sign-off at each delivery stage.
• Works with system owners (e.g. Risk, Screening, EDD, and Compliance) to align end-to-end process flows and platform configuration.
4. Testing, UAT & Post-Migration Validation
From functional readiness to real-world performance, we provide assurance that your Fenergo platform delivers as expected:
• Designs and documents UAT plans that align with policy, risk, and operational requirements.
• Supports hands-on testing and validation of workflows, client records, risk classifications, and document triggers.
• Ensures that integrated controls (e.g. EDD workflows, reassessment processes, and alerts) function as designed post-implementation.
• Provides dashboards and reporting support using tools to track progress and issues across phases.
5. KYC Data Quality & Remediation for Fenergo Readiness
Fenergo relies on accurate and compliant data. We help:
• Set and enforce data quality standards: Defining what “good” data looks like in terms of completeness, formatting, and documentation.
• Drive data remediation: Identifying and cleansing incomplete or outdated records — with rules.
• Support risk model alignment: Ensuring correct field population to support Fenergo’s risk and workflow logic.
• Monitor progress: Leveraging tools for dashboarding and issue tracking.
From strategy and design to execution and validation, Lysis provides the clarity, structure, and expertise needed to deliver business-ready Fenergo implementations.
The difference between the two
A health check refers to a high-level review of the design of a framework and can identify major problem areas in a framework. A maturity assessment is more advanced and provides a detailed review of a firm’s framework which includes the testing of the effectiveness of the framework itself.
Health Check
Maturity Assessment

Review of policies relating to relevant regulations

Review of policies relating to relevant regulations

High Level mapping of policy to regulatory obligations

Detailed mapping of policy to regulatory obligations

Review all procedures relating to operational controls and map these back to the policies

Review all procedures relating to operational controls and map these back to the policies

High Level review of the regulatory framework covering relevant systems, processes and ensuring that governance is in place in order to meet current regulatory requirements

High Level review of the regulatory framework covering relevant systems, processes and ensuring that governance is in place in order to meet current regulatory requirements

High level review of all procedures and documents describing controls and processes (excludes control testing)

Review of all procedures, controls and processes including detailed controls testing.

Carrying out a sample review of the operational outputs (files, reports etc.) in line with current policy and procedures

Reviewing any risk methodologies applied in relation to the specific regulations

Reviewing and testing any monitoring programme - this will include system profiling and reviewing parameters, as well as sample checking the outcome.

Reviewing the firm’s reporting (regulatory reporting, SARs, STORs etc) and monitoring controls

Reviewing and testing the internal and external data inputs to the process and on-going review and escalation processes

Brief review of systems which the firm uses to benchmark to best practice

Brief review of systems which the firm uses to benchmark to best practice

Reviewing the training programmes

Reviewing the training programmes

Reviewing the data retention/record keeping arrangement in relation to its obligations

Reviewing the data retention/record keeping arrangement in relation to its obligations

Meeting with personnel in the 1st and 2nd line of defence to understand the processes they undertake and to ascertain the level of understanding of the regulatory requirements within

Presentation of detailed findings in report format

Presentation of detailed findings in report format including an assessment against the maturity of processes amongst similar firms in the market (market benchmarking) and its suitability for the firm's business mix and risks.
Increase effectiveness,
focus on efficiency
To optimise firms’ FC controls, require an increase in effectiveness of processes along with a dedicated focus on high efficiency which will facilitate sustainable processes to demonstrate effective FC controls under scrutiny.
Firms must also view the improvement of their FC controls as a good commercial investment by focusing on the business advantages these could have for the firm.
Developing Effective Financial Crime (FC) Frameworks
The following directional indicators provide a high-level overview of the implementation and ongoing assessment of sustainable FC controls.
Risks / Actions / Benefits
Assessment of FC risk & controls effectiveness (“FCRA”)
Understand the FC risk and the effectiveness of existing controls.
Create and maintain a library of existing FC risks & controls (tested & untested)
Conduct the mandatory annual FCRA, to drive decisions on: Improvements /transformations; Resources; Management of gaps and de-risking activities; Prioritisations and budgets; MLRO report.
Cost / benefit analysis and assessment of FC controls
Provide clearer understanding of the real cost of compliance.
Continuous risk/benefit assessment to drive controls enhancement and optimisation across FC operations (KYC/KYCC, TM, Screening, escalation);
Effectiveness of FC risk and controls reporting (MI – complete,
accurate and timely);
Costs and impact analysis on:
De-risking – cost/benefit, strategy, action;
Optimisation of FC controls - Sustainability
Improve the effectiveness and efficiency of FC controls driving sustainability.
Prioritisation & decision – FC governance - supported by complete, accurate & timely MI;
Budgets – Senior executive and board approval
Supporting resources planning for 6 months/12 months/3 years to
support:
Lean FC governance and robust 3LoD structure and capabilities;
Clear and realistic objectives taking into consideration the 10
universal outcomes of Principled Performance;
Adequate resources with the necessary skills and expertise to drive
high performance.
Automation focus on optimisation across:
Assurance and Testing
Assess, measure, and provide ongoing assurance.
Development of assurance plan and control testing – assess and measure;
Reporting into a functional FC Governance structure to support decisions:
Executive decisions;
Committees & forums.
Escalation and decision on tactical/planned improvements.